On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 09:51:35AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 10:23:22AM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 05:04:06PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > What's the current status for running clang on sparc64? > > > > Last time we played with this (february?) it was able to compile > > a seemingly working world. So I guess it's not that terribly broken. > > > > We didnt test that much stuff though. > > > > > In particular, flame.freebsd.org is running 10.1-PRERELEASE > > > compiled with gcc 4.2.1. Any chance that clanf can be > > > made available on flame? > > > > I think your best bet is to compile it on flame yourself or crosscompile > > world for sparc64 and use it on flame. > > > > Was your testing with the in-tree llvm/clang or upstream? > Should I try to compile lang/clang35 or lang/clang-devel? > > My main (and perhaps only) interest is to test the ld128 > math libraries functions that I've been writing.
In-tree clang is ok. We have backported all the relevant patches. Roman _______________________________________________ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
