on 23/08/2013 15:56 David Chisnall said the following: > So you don't want a working debugger? Our gdb doesn't work at all on MIPS > and barely works with code compiled with clang or a recent gcc.
I am capable of using devel/gdb. Or do you mean kernel debugger? > We are > planning on importing LLDB soon (Ed Maste has been working on it, funded by > the FreeBSD Foundation), and it is a C++11 code base. It will not build with > our gcc or with our libstdc++ (and, in fact, since it uses the LLVM > libraries, will require LLVM in base to link libc++). There are multiple possible solutions to this issue. And note that I do support having clang in base and it being the default in head. > Or perhaps you don't care about flattened device trees. To be honest - no, I don't care about them. > The device tree > compiler that we have in base is written in C++ and contains numerous > occurrences of ugly code to make it work with old compilers. I will be very > happy to remove a load of hacks once C++11 support is available in the base > system (not for 10.0, as dtc is used on a lot of tier 2 archs where gcc is > still default). -- Andriy Gapon _______________________________________________ freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
