On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 05:25:47PM +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> This suggests a different rather simpler change. Libthr can always use
> its rtld lock implementation instead of only when multiple threads
> exist. This avoids the sigprocmask() syscalls and should not be much
> slower than the default implementation in rtld because that also
> contains atomic operations (both the unpatched and the patched version).
> People that care about performance of exceptions can then link in libthr
> (in many cases, it is already linked in to allow for (the possibility
> of) threading).

> I have tested this and exceptions were indeed more than twice as fast in
> my test program if I created an extra thread doing nothing than in the
> fully single-threaded version (with or without libthr).

Here is a patch. It is lightly tested.

The function _thr_rtld_fini() can be removed afterwards because it is no
longer used.

Index: lib/libthr/thread/thr_init.c
===================================================================
--- lib/libthr/thread/thr_init.c        (revision 244639)
+++ lib/libthr/thread/thr_init.c        (working copy)
@@ -363,6 +363,7 @@
                _thr_signal_init();
                if (_thread_event_mask & TD_CREATE)
                        _thr_report_creation(curthread, curthread);
+               _thr_rtld_init();
        }
 }
 
Index: lib/libthr/thread/thr_kern.c
===================================================================
--- lib/libthr/thread/thr_kern.c        (revision 244639)
+++ lib/libthr/thread/thr_kern.c        (working copy)
@@ -57,11 +57,6 @@
                return (0);
 
        __isthreaded = threaded;
-       if (threaded != 0) {
-               _thr_rtld_init();
-       } else {
-               _thr_rtld_fini();
-       }
        return (0);
 }
 

-- 
Jilles Tjoelker
_______________________________________________
freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Reply via email to