On Sep 19, 2008, at 7:07 PM, Aragon Gouveia wrote:
To get a business to commit resources to a project there must be an
actual goal.
[1] The FreeBSD project would have to commit resources too. Its
community
Of course. This is what the requirements analysis is ;-)
For (a), (b), and (z), this is where you come in. Define the goal.
Make a
plan to get there. Assess the effort involved. Convince your
employer that
(a), (b) and (z) is worth it to him/her and that the result of (z)
will
convince the FreeBSD project to commit the resources needed to
integrate it.
If they're happy, start working on (z) and bring it to the FreeBSD
project
when you think it's ready.
Of course. If this was something that could be done without working
with the freebsd developers, do you think I would put up with this
kind of abuse? I'd much rather have something I could just go and
do ;-)
The issue is that nobody is willing to answer the question: "what
resources are too limited to provide longer support? How can we help?"
This the elephant that everyone ignores. To develop a plan, you need
to know the limitations. Once those are spelled out, you sit down and
try to determine what resources are necessary to achieve a certain
goal. Then you find those resources, etc etc...
Without input from the current release team extending the support
schedule is not possible.
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source
and other randomness
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"