On Sep 19, 2008, at 7:07 PM, Aragon Gouveia wrote:
To get a business to commit resources to a project there must be an
actual goal.

[1] The FreeBSD project would have to commit resources too. Its community

Of course.  This is what the requirements analysis is ;-)

For (a), (b), and (z), this is where you come in. Define the goal. Make a plan to get there. Assess the effort involved. Convince your employer that (a), (b) and (z) is worth it to him/her and that the result of (z) will convince the FreeBSD project to commit the resources needed to integrate it. If they're happy, start working on (z) and bring it to the FreeBSD project
when you think it's ready.


Of course. If this was something that could be done without working with the freebsd developers, do you think I would put up with this kind of abuse? I'd much rather have something I could just go and do ;-)

The issue is that nobody is willing to answer the question: "what resources are too limited to provide longer support? How can we help?"

This the elephant that everyone ignores. To develop a plan, you need to know the limitations. Once those are spelled out, you sit down and try to determine what resources are necessary to achieve a certain goal. Then you find those resources, etc etc...

Without input from the current release team extending the support schedule is not possible.

--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness


_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to