John Baldwin wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > [...]
> > Now i'm wondering: Has the ACPI blacklist been removed
> > intentionally, or is this a regression? Certainly I did
> > not find any mentioning of it in UPDATING or anywhere
> > else.
>
> This is a regression. Try this fix:
>
> Index: acpi_quirk.c
> ===================================================================
> --- acpi_quirk.c (revision 183112)
> +++ acpi_quirk.c (working copy)
> @@ -149,9 +149,9 @@
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(AcpiGetTableHeader(ACPI_SIG_FADT, 0, &fadt)))
> bzero(&fadt, sizeof(fadt));
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(AcpiGetTableHeader(ACPI_SIG_DSDT, 0, &dsdt)))
> - bzero(&fadt, sizeof(dsdt));
> + bzero(&dsdt, sizeof(dsdt));
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(AcpiGetTableHeader(ACPI_SIG_XSDT, 0, &xsdt)))
> - bzero(&fadt, sizeof(xsdt));
> + bzero(&xsdt, sizeof(xsdt));
>
> /* Then, override the quirks with any matched from table signatures. */
> for (entry = acpi_quirks_table; entry->match; entry++) {
>
Thanks for the quick reply. I will try this on Friday
when I'm near the console. I'm a little reluctant to
try it remotely.
Best regards
Oliver
--
Oliver Fromme, secnetix GmbH & Co. KG, Marktplatz 29, 85567 Grafing b. M.
Handelsregister: Registergericht Muenchen, HRA 74606, Geschäftsfuehrung:
secnetix Verwaltungsgesellsch. mbH, Handelsregister: Registergericht Mün-
chen, HRB 125758, Geschäftsführer: Maik Bachmann, Olaf Erb, Ralf Gebhart
FreeBSD-Dienstleistungen, -Produkte und mehr: http://www.secnetix.de/bsd
"The ITU has offered the IETF formal alignment with its
corresponding technology, Penguins, but that won't fly."
-- RFC 2549
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
