Hello, and thank you for your reply.

Quoting Peter Jeremy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

On 2008-Sep-02 10:49:43 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I en devoured to install a copy of 7 as an effort to upgrade
one of our servers. After installing a few ports, I began to notice:
[: -le: argument expected messages being emitted during the configure/make
process.

This probably indicates badly written configure scripts that have
things like "[ 23 -le $x ]" but don't set $x.  The solution is to
write patches for the configure scripts and feed them back upstream.

Bummer.


I've already invested a fair amount of time on this upgrade,
and /really/ don't want to wipe the disk(s) and start all over.

I'm not sure how this will help.

Good. Perhaps you (or anyone) can suggest how I might debug /when/where/
these eval are called. I could use /usr/bin/script, but not sure how to
(e)grep the culprit(s).


This
issue is not new to me - see thread:[: -le: argument expected for details.

You haven't mentioned where this thread exists - definitely not here.

Ahem...

Quoting Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 10:18:14AM -0800, Chris H. wrote:
I wanted to sync up my ports database before hand. So ran a portsdb -uU.
---8<---[huge snip]---8<---

Hello again Jeremy,
Well, after carefully examining your reply; emptying /etc/make.conf;
searching for any sign of another Apache APR, and finding none.;
performing a cvsup -g -L 2 ports-supfile && portsdb -uU && pkgdb -F;
which resulted in many [: -le: argument expected's, and
[: -eq: argument expected's; I performed a: cd /usr/ports/lang/php5 &&
make extract; Yep! You guessed it, [: -le: argument expected again!

Well, what was expected to be a 3 day affair, has turned into a 2 week
affair. At least that's been my past experience with installing a
FreeBSD server (3 days). :)

Anyway, I've run out of patience (and time) debugging this issue. So
I think it would be more expedient to wipe the disk and start anew. :)

If I should run into this again on the new install. I guess a
send-pr would be in order. Oh, and expect /alot/ of noise in the list. :)

Thank you again for your continued (and valued) input.

Best wishes.

--Chris H

[Hide Quoted Text]

--
| Jeremy Chadwick                                    jdc at parodius.com |
| Parodius Networking                           http://www.parodius.com/ |
| UNIX Systems Administrator                      Mountain View, CA, USA |
| Making life hard for others since 1977.                  PGP: 4BD6C0CB |

_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

I didn't mean to sound argumentative but the above was my last posting
to the thread: [: -le: argument expected
in freebsd-stable on Feb 2008. :)

Thanks again for taking the time to respond.

--Chris


--
Peter Jeremy
Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement
an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.




_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to