> From: "Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:03:24 -0400 (EDT) > Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:25:33PM +0200, Oliver Brandmueller wrote: > > > OK, thanx for clarification. I totally overlooked the updated bind port; > > > anyhow, I use base system bind and didn't plan to change that (although > > > it might me a good idea, as this situation clearly shows). > > > > You can always use the WITH_REPLACE_BASE option in the port to > > overwrite the base system named, or use the differences in the > > extracted tarball of 9.5.0 vs 9.5.0-P1 to update the source of the > > base one yourself. > > > Shouldn't you also add : > > NO_BIND= true # do not build BIND > > into /etc/make.conf if you do, so it doesn't get clobbered?
Or, for V7, add : WITHOUT_BIND=1 to /etc/src.conf. And this assumes that you will be re-building the system before the base system is patched. Note that this will also cause mergemaster to ask about deleting /etc/rc.d/named. Just say 'no'! -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
pgpB7OikfQ41H.pgp
Description: PGP signature
