On Jun 5, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
It's quite possible what was proposed is an awful idea and if it is
so be it. But it would appear as though it wasn't even considered.
On the contrary. This, and lots of other ideas have been given very
careful consideration and have been rejected due to lack of
resources. There, feel better?
Seriously folks, it's not as if we don't _want_ to be able to
provide better, longer, faster, $whatever support. We're just trying
to be realistic about what we can reasonably do with what we have
available.
Doug, would you possibly (without attacking me?) give some insight
into the issues here? This is what I was asking: what prevents
supporting 6.2 ? Where could I best apply some of my time to improve
the situation?
--
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source
and other randomness
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
