It depends a lot on your workload I'd say.
for me its pretty stable on a amd64 7-STABLE box that just does a little light mail and web and package building.
for others not so much.

info on my system below if anyones interested.

Vince

(20:12:28 </usr/home/jhary>) 0 $ more /boot/loader.conf
geom_mirror_load=YES
vm.kmem_size="768M"
vm.kmem_size_max="768M"
snd_emu10k1_load=YES
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(20:12:39 </usr/home/jhary>) 0 $ uptime
 8:12PM  up 13 days, 19:16, 5 users, load averages: 1.21, 0.86, 0.44
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(20:12:50 </usr/home/jhary>) 0 $ zfs list
NAME       USED  AVAIL  REFER  MOUNTPOINT
data       164G  64.8G    18K  /data
data/usr   163G  64.8G   163G  /usr
data/var   306M  64.8G   306M  /var
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(20:13:00 </usr/home/jhary>) 0 $ zpool status
  pool: data
 state: ONLINE
 scrub: none requested
config:

        NAME        STATE     READ WRITE CKSUM
        data        ONLINE       0     0     0
          mirror    ONLINE       0     0     0
            ad6s2   ONLINE       0     0     0
            ad4s2   ONLINE       0     0     0

errors: No known data errors

relevent bits from dmesg:

CPU: AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 242 (1594.18-MHz K8-class CPU)
  Origin = "AuthenticAMD"  Id = 0xf5a  Stepping = 10

Features=0x78bfbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,CLFLUSH,MMX,FXSR,SSE,SSE2>
  AMD Features=0xe0500800<SYSCALL,NX,MMX+,LM,3DNow!+,3DNow!>
usable memory = 3210489856 (3061 MB)
avail memory  = 3103461376 (2959 MB)
ACPI APIC Table: <A M I  OEMAPIC >
FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
 cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0
 cpu1 (AP): APIC ID:  1









Jisakiel wrote:
¿So no chances of ZFS stable on FBSD7? I was actually considering debian over freebsd on a dual AMD64, but if there are no settings that will make it stable... Nevertheless I'd be willing to help debugging ZFS on that machine (Dell T105) as soon as I receive it in a couple of weeks, as I'm in no rush to getting it into production (just tell me what to do ;) ).
----- Mensaje original ----
De: Spike Ilacqua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: Ender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Johan Ström <[EMAIL 
PROTECTED]>
Enviado: martes, 8 de abril, 2008 18:13:32
Asunto: Re: ZFS deadlock

Depending on your work load you are just buying more time, so "reasonable" is a matter of perspective. :( I didn't see if you said you are on 32bit or 64bit? Keep in mind the kmem max is 1.5-2G on amd64 regardless of how much memory you have. If 512M arcsize crashes too soon for your tastes you can always lower it down to 256M, or 128M, etc.

I tried for several weeks to get ZFS stable on a 64bit system with a 1.5G kernel. The best uptime I ever got was 72 hours, the worst was 2, the average about 24. Interestingly, most of the hangs were at off hours, when the system was lightly loaded, had lots of free memory, etc. That suggests to me a slow leak of some sort.

Anyway, ZFS is not ready for production. Some people may get lucky, but you can't count on it.

Spike
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"






______________________________________________ ¿Con Mascota por primera vez? Sé un mejor Amigo. Entra en Yahoo! Respuestas http://es.answers.yahoo.com/info/welcome
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to