On Tue, Mar 04, 2008 at 03:22:00AM -0800, Chris H. wrote: > No. It's not a matter of "holding back". I really don't want to spam > the stable list with ports litter. My main concern/question was in > figuring out why 2 identical server configs would react so differently > in the way they handle lo0 and friends - rbldnsd, or no rbldnsd.
Have you recently diffed the actual running config files? From the sidelines, it sounds like a change may have been made and forgotten, or made by another admin which could be causing issues. I know that often when I start thinking, "Nothing is different the software is broken!" something is different. Important files off the top of my head: /etc/defaults/rc.conf /etc/rc.conf /etc/rc.local /etc/namedb/named.conf (and friends) /usr/local/etc/whatever_rbldnsd_uses pkg_info | egrep '(rbldns|named)' and then diff that output. maybe diff the "ifconfig -a" output between the two boxes and verify the expected differences. I think more details might actually translate to less clutter on the -stable list, even if it turns out to be ports related. -- Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
