[note: this question probably should have been asked and answered on freebsd-ports@, but I'll go ahead and answer it here in any case.]
The latest chart that compares package status across build environments is at http://portsmon.freebsd.org/chartsandgraphs/package_comparison.html. Note: the detail pages that it points to are several weeks stale. (The copies on my development machine are up-to-date, however). The full list of what ports do not package on amd64-7 is at http://portsmon.freebsd.org/chartsandgraphs/package_failures_list.amd64-7.html. It will give you more information than you probably want to know about the exact state of amd64-7 as of that date. On my machine, the latest stats for amd64-7 are the following: 232 errors 1195 skipped ports 548 dependent ports as opposed to i386-7: 268 errors 636 skipped ports 429 dependent ports and i386-6: 70 errors 449 skipped ports 217 dependent ports and amd64-6: 62 errors 1007 skipped ports 775 dependent ports I've been trying to do a lot of work to give us metrics about the state of the packages, but this work is not yet in production. Note: some of these numbers are a little high because a patch file for java/diablo-jdk15 didn't fetch properly, leading to a bunch of dependent java ports not being built. This has now been fixed. mcl _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
