Deep in the forest in the dark of night on Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 19:23 with a cackle and an evil grin Scot Hetzel cast another eye of newt into the brew and chanted:
> On 1/27/07, Bill Vermillion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >No real problem there, but that brings up another question. > >If - as documented in make.conf(5) - I put use the variable > >NO_DYNAMIC_ROOT it says "set this is you do not want to link > >/bin and /sbin dynamically". > > > >Would that be the way to build statics in /bin and /sbin > >instead of NO_SHARED. > > > I forgot about that option. Using NO_DYNAMIC_ROOT would be the proper > way to build /bin and /sbin statically, and still have the rest > compied dynamically. > > Scot > -- > DISCLAIMER: > No electrons were mamed while sending this message. Only > slightly bruised. Thanks for confirming that - the NO_DYNAMIC_ROOT not 'no electonrs were harmed :-) Now - I wonder what should be done with the failures encountered when NO_SHARED is used. I suspect it should be cleaned up, if for no reason than to keep messages/queries such as mine from shwoing up. Thanks again. Bill -- Bill Vermillion - bv @ wjv . com _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
