On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 04:23:13PM +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote.. > On 2007.01.27 13:04:28 -0200, JoaoBR wrote: > > On Saturday 27 January 2007 12:32, Jim Pingle wrote: > > > Roland Smith wrote: > > > > Most spammers do not bother to return if they get a resend request. > > > > That's the whole point of doing this. So practically it doesn't increase > > > > bandwidth consumption. > > > > > ... > > > Greylisting is a decent idea, but it seems to me that it's just another > > > tool in the ongoing arms race against spammers. It may work for a while, > > > but eventually they'll catch on and it will only cause unnecessary delays > > > for legitimate mail. > > > > finally some cares about the users here, that is a really important point, > > how > > do you justify that your client get the email he is waiting for an hour > > later? Probably he looks then for a better service provider ... > > Could this discussion please be continued on the apropriate list which > is designed for spam - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or -chat, or wherever, but not on -stable please. -- Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
