On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 11:56:21PM -0800, Russell Jackson wrote: > Whatever that last em commit was, it seems to have made the interrupt > issues better. It still seems high, but it's a lot better than the > 2000/s I was getting before. > > interrupt total rate > irq1: atkbd0 54 0 > irq6: fdc0 10 0 > irq14: ata0 16 0 > irq15: ata1 47 0 > irq16: nvidia0+++ 1095231 677 > irq18: uhci2+ 3421 2 > irq23: ehci0 1 0 > irq48: em0 115315 71 > cpu0: timer 3230219 1997 > cpu1: timer 3228221 1996 > Total 7672535 4744 >
It appears that I hit upon a fluke. The machine finally hung again after a few days of use, and I found after the hard reset that the interrupt problem was back. So, I'm back to running sans apic for now. Actually, after re-reading all the previous threads again, it doesn't appear that any of the recent fixes to em had anything to do with the shared irq issues anyhow. I'm now left feeling a bit confused, but that may just be due to lack of sleep. -- Russell A. Jackson Network Analyst California State University, Bakersfield _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
