Scott Long skrev:
In any case, SCHED_ULE is still considered to be highly experimental.
> Hopefully it will get some more attention in the near future to
> bring it closer to production quality.
Can we have a commit (at least to STABLE) that adds a big fat message
during boot that goes something like:
### >>>> You are using SCHED_ULE scheduler <<<< ###
### SCHED_ULE is still considered to be highly experimental ###
### Please revert to SCHED_4BSD before reporting problems. ###
### (Unless of course you are reporting a ULE scheduler bug) ###
So we don't waste time analyzing errors that are caused by ULE. The /.
crowd seems to think that because ULE is newer than 4BSD it is somehow
magically better and more bug free :-)
Having said that I see the em timeouts both with ULE and 4BSD.
/Martin
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
