Brooks Davis wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 06:04:37PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 11:01:43AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >>>> Brooks Davis wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Jul 06, 2006 at 02:45:45AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >>>>>> I normally run the command >>>>>> # pkg_version -Iv | grep \< >>>>>> before running 'portupgrade -a', to see what's going to happen. This >>>>>> time I got the following output: >>>>>> >>>>>> diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00 < needs updating (index has >>>>>> 1.5.0.07.00) >>>>>> >>>>>> It seems that the tool is confused by the i386 in the package name. >>>>> Actually I think it's confused by the fact that the package name is >>>>> "diablo-jdk" and the version is "freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00". That's >>>>> just plain bogus. >>>>> >>>> So who is at fault? The ports infrastructure or the FreeBSD foundation? >>> I don't know. How did you install it? >> # pkg_add diablo-jdk-freebsd6.i386.1.5.0.07.00.tbz > > It definitly installs correctly if you use the port instead of the > package. It looks like the package is incorrect. >
Yes, that fixed it. So I guess the FreeBSD foundation is at fault. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
