On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 12:11:03AM +0200, M.Hirsch wrote..
> <snip>
> 
> >.. So the logs are there, all that's required is a utility to read them
> >and, optionally, alert the administrator to the event,
> >
> > 
> >
> No, I think a panic _should_ occur, even if there was a correctable 
> error. Not "when there's no other option left".
You really have never seen a machine used for serious business apparantly.

> Maybe make it optional via a kernel option.
> There are much less-significant problems that can cause a panic.

panics like that should be eradicated, adding more nonsensical panics
is not what we need.

> Sure, you may be one of the few people out there who knows how to 
> correctly run a _BSD_ system...
> There's few of yous out there, ;)
> 
> M.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
--- end of quoted text ---

-- 
Wilko Bulte                             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to