On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 12:11:03AM +0200, M.Hirsch wrote.. > <snip> > > >.. So the logs are there, all that's required is a utility to read them > >and, optionally, alert the administrator to the event, > > > > > > > No, I think a panic _should_ occur, even if there was a correctable > error. Not "when there's no other option left".
You really have never seen a machine used for serious business apparantly. > Maybe make it optional via a kernel option. > There are much less-significant problems that can cause a panic. panics like that should be eradicated, adding more nonsensical panics is not what we need. > Sure, you may be one of the few people out there who knows how to > correctly run a _BSD_ system... > There's few of yous out there, ;) > > M. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" --- end of quoted text --- -- Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"