One would ask as to why xorg has failed to compile, and it appears no one else here has experienced the same issue; hence the reason I suggested a clean removal of installed ports and a vanilla compile of it.
I've updated my ports from the cvs, and haven't experienced an xorg compilation issue - I compile from the standard /usr/ports/x11/xorg location, and I don't see to suffer the same issues - co-incidence or simply being boring with the locating of things has saved me from compilation problems? Matty On 6/4/06, Wolfgang Zenker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/3/06, doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Unless you have a reason to want to modify the source, why not use the >> package: >> setenv PACKAGEROOT ftp://ftp<n>.FreeBSD.org >> pkg_add -r xorg >> will get you 6.9.0_1 in a few minutes > There have been updates released after it was released - nothing wrong with > building from the source, the problem is when people compile from all weird > locations, with all weird settings, then complain that the shit hit the fan. In this case the OP just used WRKDIRPREFIX, which is the documented way of having your port build directories outside /usr/ports. I wouldn't call that "compile from all weird locations, with all weird settings". Wolfgang
_______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
