On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 02:03:13PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote: > Dmitriy Kirhlarov wrote: > >Hi! > > > >On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 01:22:26PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > >>>I think it's same problem as in thread "fsck_ufs locked in snaplk". > >>>Is this problem fixed in fresh 6.1-PRE? > >>> > >>I think we've reproduced the problem, but it probably won't be fixed > >>before the release. Sorry, the bug reports came too late in the > >>release cycle. > >> > > > >Imho, it's bad idea -- create release with so important bug. It's not > >coda, unionfs or something else. It's very useful. > >I think, postpone release for fix this issue -- more fine. > > > > Ditto, same thing with the recent nve fixes. Why release known broken > code when there are tested patches available? Whats the worst that will > happen? It wont work? Thats already the case...
What patches? If you're talking about the mpsafe quota patches, they don't address the deadlocks. Kris
pgpjxK9pG9hNR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
