Then why not work on adding the functionality? I'm sure freebsd people would love to have a proper working 32 bit compatibility layer happening. On 5/1/06, Mikhail Teterin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
понеділок 01 травень 2006 18:55, Jonathan Noack написав: > Did you miss the previous reply which mentioned using '-B/usr/lib32 > -B/usr/local/lib32' in addition to '-m32'?I did not miss this work-around. But it is not a proper way -- one need not specify -B/usr/lib in the 64-bit case. Nor should one need to specify -B/usr/lib32, when using the -m32 flag. The gcc's multilib.h functionality is just for that. We just aren't using it (although we do for for aout) -- presumably, because there *was* a much bigger fish to fry to enable such compiles... -mi _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
-- Sean Bryant
_______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
