On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 05:24:10PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Sun, 2 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > >>Right, but why are they doing it *consistently* in FreeBSD 6.x, when they > >>never did it in FreeBSD 4.x? I have postmaster processes running on the > >>FreeBSD box as far back as November 27th, 2005 ... and have *never* > >>experienced this problem ... so it isn't PostgreSQL that has changed, > >>something in FreeBSD has changed :( > > > >You'll need to do some debugging to find out which of the two causes > >of EINVAL are true here (or some undocumented cause). > > 'k, right now, the checks in PostgreSQL are just seeing if the result of > semctl < 0 ... i see from the man page what 'two values' of EINVAL you are > referring to ... but, if they both return the same ERRNO, how do I > determine which of the two is the cause of the problem? :(
Evaluate context: what other semaphore operations have been performed previously? Kris
pgptM0Z3dvSMd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
