On Monday 06 March 2006 10:34, Patrick M. Hausen wrote: > Hi! > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 10:26:53AM -0300, JoaoBR wrote: > > > I did configure quite a few servers with soft-updates on all > > > partitions, when soft-updates were rather new and I was > > > excited about the performance gain and didn't know about > > > the possible problems with / - as I said, I never had a > > > single problem with that setup. > > > > softupdate except for / is the default I guess so you do not need to > > enable it > > It is the default _now_. I started using soft-updates when > you still needed to change some kernel files and recompile > to activate it at all. > > FreeBSD since 1.0 ;-) >
well well, better to say nothing but this is freebsd-stable in 2006 ... :S João A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
