On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:08:16PM +0600, Pavel Gubin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 01:00:38AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 11:58:33AM +0600, Pavel Gubin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 12:48:24AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > I've got some machine which is almost idle and works now almost only 
> > > > > as dialup
> > > > > server. The problem was that this machine was very stable under 
> > > > > 5.4-RELEASE,
> > > > > but after upgrading (via buildworld/installworld) to 6.0-RELEASE-p4 
> > > > > and then
> > > > > to 6.1-PRERELEASE (4 days ago) the machine panices (uptime from an 
> > > > > hour to
> > > > > a day or two).
> > > > 
> > > > Are you using stale modules?
> > > 
> > >   No, there was full buildworld/buildkernel/installkernel/installworld
> > > cycle, and now all files in /boot/kernel are dated 2-Mar-2006.
> > > 
> > > >  Those panic traces don't make much sense to me.
> > > 
> > >   Maybe I can do something else? Coredumps are on hand and can be digged 
> > > in
> > > all directions :)
> > 
> > What compiler flags are you using to build your kernel?
> 
>   The build was done with "make buildkernel KERNCONF=Fet", and seems that
> /etc/make.conf does not contain variables that can have any effect on
> compiler:

Strange.  What does DDB say about the stack trace when it panics?

Kris

Attachment: pgpztxZ4n7iGr.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to