On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 12:31:52AM +0100, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > I agree that a more flexible approach is generally better, but since > it's not necessary I don't want to create an extra entry in my > /etc/usbd.conf (one more file to worry about during mergemaster).
IIRC, usbd is/will be deprecated in favor of devd. > Thus I think the best solution would be to dump devfs.conf and > /etc/rc.d/devfs entirely (or leave it optional for backwards > compatibility) and give devfs the ability to create links. Yeah, I agree that would be best. I'd be willing to look into that, but not before mid-januari. > I have a dislike for inconsistent solutions and I think most people here > share this dislike. It's just what happens when software grows. Sooner > or later you get to the point where you should throw away 80% of what's > there and turn the rest into something that does what needs to be done. Well, an adequate solution now always beats a perfect solution later. :-) Roland -- R.F.Smith (http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/) Please send e-mail as plain text. public key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt
pgpcSQKd2w9pW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
