On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:27:21PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, dick hoogendijk wrote: > > >Sure, but I think it's the *syntax* that matters here? options -> > >nooptions / i486_cpu -> no??? It's OK to leave GENERIC alone, but HOW > >are things switched off? > > It appears to be an ommission in the file format. I've e-mailed Ruslan, > who implemented nodevice and nooption, to suggest that he also add nocpu. > I wonder if there are other missed syntactic bits of note. > I've committed a code that implements the "nocpu" directive, FWIW.
Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD committer
pgpULrnOwKtmo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
