Robert Watson wrote: > There are several ways you can do it, but they generally fall into two > classes of activies: > > (1) Modifying the name space exclusion assumption for jails, so that the > file system name spaces overlap. One way to do this is with nullfs. > > (2) Having a daemon or tool that runs outside of the jail and brokers > communication between the jails. One example might be a daemon that > inserts a UNIX domain socket into both jails and then provides > references to shared IPC objects between the two "by request". > Another example might be a daemon or tool that responds to a request > and creates a hard link from a socket/fifo endpoint visible in one > jail to a name visible in another jail, perhaps when setting up the > jail. The former requires more infrastructure, but the latter is less > flexible.
The jail(8) man page says that if the MIB security.jail.sysvipc_allowed=1 processes inside a jail can use IPC to talk to stuff in other jails. How does that affect mysql in a jail? Do I need this enabled to run mysql? _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
