On Fri, Jul 22, 2005 at 01:38:40AM +0100, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Karl Denninger wrote: > > >If Soren BELIEVES (2) is the case, I'll test against -BETA1, IF I can > >have confirmation that -BETA1 has the ATA-NG code in it. > > > >Its trivially easy for me to reproduce this problem on my sandbox > >machine. > > As has already been stated, Soren's changes are in 6.x. If you are able > to test this workload against 6.0-BETA1 using the hardware in question, > that would be very helpful. Depending on the nature of the workload and > problem, you might find you need to compile out the debugging features, > as they slow things down quite a bit, so might reduce the transaction > rate sufficiently to make the problem fail to occur. If it requires 5.x > applications, you might find you have to wait for BETA2. > > Robert N M Watson
As I pointed out in my PR, "make -j4 buildworld" is more than sufficient to demonstrate the problem. This is why I don't understand why it has been ignored - it is easily reproducable using stock Adaptec SATA controllers, standard SATA drives, and a gmirror RAID 1 configuration. This is pretty pedestrian stuff here Robert.... Two disks on one adapter, on a PCI bus..... I'll pull over 6.0-BETA1, rebuild the array (that is the time-consuming part of this test - takes 6-8 hours for the rebuild to run) and see if it fails during a buildworld. -- -- Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do! http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING! http://homecuda.com Emerald Coast: Buy / sell homes, cars, boats! http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
