On Friday 15 July 2005 04:53 pm, Emanuel Strobl wrote: > Am Freitag, 15. Juli 2005 22:12 CEST schrieb Eirik Øverby: > > On Jul 15, 2005, at 5:10 PM, Emanuel Strobl wrote: > > > Am Freitag, 15. Juli 2005 16:58 CEST schrieb Marc G. Fournier: > > >> And, for "the stupid question of the day" ... how long before > > >> 5.x is no > > >> longer supported? I'm just about to deploy a new server, and > > >> was *going* to go with 5.x, but would I be better just > > >> skipping 5.x altogether? Or are there such drastic changes in > > >> 6.x that doing so at > > >> this time wouldn't be prudent? > > > > > > To post my opinion to the last part of the question: I'm also > > > deploying new > > > servers and I'll take RELENG_6 since there are so many > > > improovements (nullfs in jails etc.) and 6-current has been > > > pretty stable for me on my > > > > Hoi, > > what's changed wrt jails? And nullfs? I haven't been following > > the "news" as closely as I perhaps should, but I feel that the > > jail functionality doesn't get half as much attention in release > > notes as it should... Porting my jail-related tools to 5.x from > > 4.x was painful, but enjoyable when I was done. How does 6.x > > look? > > I'm not the developer guy so I can't tell you anything > authoritative but I know that there has been an awful perfomance > degradation when mounting nullfs-filesystems into a jail under > RELENG_5, espacially noticable with apache! I just know that Jeff > Roberson committed incredible lots of vm/vfs changes, perhaps this > also solved the md performance problem, at least the nullfs problem > was solved! > The nullfs performace issue has been fixed.
-- Anish Mistry
pgpu9T1iSxoEY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
