# [EMAIL PROTECTED] / 2005-06-06 10:25:51 -0300:
> several linux distros have achieved a difficult goal: ease of
> installation-use combined with a stable system. (...) I think that
> there are a lot of linux distros out there that are really easy to
> use, and even more "friendly" or "beatiful" than windows. I dont
> think that FreeBSD has achieved this. (...)
> But I see it is not desktop oriented (I repeat, this seems ok for me.
> FreeBSD is better for a server station, not for a desktop).
I use FreeBSD 4.x on my desktop machines, also with excellent
results. I'm glad FreeBSD is different, that's why I use this
OS and not Windows or another OS that runs breakneck to achieve
its levels of idiot-friendliness.
I see two fallacies in your post:
* being further in the race to copycat Windows is an
achievement. Gee, why aren't all these people using Linux then?
* FreeBSD is a worse desktop operating system than Linux. How come
I haven't noticed during the last few years?
--
How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
You don't know, man. You don't KNOW.
Cause you weren't THERE. http://bash.org/?255991
_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
