On Fri, 03 Jun 2005 11:41:30 +0200 fandino wrote: > Boris Samorodov wrote: > >>I removed temporally all /usr/lib/libkadm5srv* libraries and as results > >>kadmin was forced to load /usr/local libraries, but I get the same > >>problem :-( > > > >>again kadmin doesn't use ldap and fallback to database files. > > From your dump: > > 58516 kadmin CALL access(0x28079000,0) > > 58516 kadmin NAMI "/usr/lib/libhdb.so.7" > > 58516 kadmin RET access 0 > > 58516 kadmin CALL open(0x28076040,0,0xbfbfebcc) > > 58516 kadmin NAMI "/usr/lib/libhdb.so.7" > > 58516 kadmin RET open 3 > > 58516 kadmin CALL fstat(0x3,0xbfbfebcc) > > 58516 kadmin RET fstat 0 > > 58516 kadmin CALL read(0x3,0x28070c40,0x1000) > > 58516 kadmin GIO fd 3 read 4096 bytes > > Thus kadmin is using the system libhdb. The port version shuold be > > at > > /usr/local/lib.
> Effectively /usr/lib/libhdb.so.7 was the cause of the problem. Thank you > Boris. You are welcome. > I'd like to ask what is the proper way of treat with this conflict? So do I. > is it unavoidable? The same. > is there any solution? I already gave you a skeleton of the wrapping script for kadmin with search-order changed for libraries. IMO it's the most effective way at the matter. Does someone know the right solution? > Also it'd be interesting if a warning was printed by the port install script > advising the consequences of enable "LDAP backend" in the heimdal port. Please, do send-pr with your suggestion. WBR -- bsam _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
