On Sunday 22 May 2005 06:24 pm, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Friday 20 May 2005 10:20 pm, John Baldwin wrote: > > I have a patch to make the PIR code trust the BIOS in this case over the > > $PIR table that you can test if you want. Actually, I committed the > > patch finally a while ago. It is rev 1.117 in HEAD. It should backport > > to 5.x directly. Try that and see if it fixes your problem. > > I wiped the drive and started over with a new install. Then, I applied > your patch and rebooted into the new kernel. My dmesg output was identical > between the two kernels (save for the normal little things like minor skew > in clock rates). Pardon my ignorance, but should I be somehow requesting > that my cbb device get bound to IRQ 11 instead of 10? There's no line > containing "cbb" in /boot/device.hints; should I add one?
The patch should change the IRQ numbers and also print out a line about how it is trusting your BIOS over the $PIR, so I think you didn't backport the patch correctly or boot the patched kernel somehow. -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
