The local guru is Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> You might also be interested in http://www.trustedbsd.org
Wilko On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 07:42:44AM -0400, Michael A. Koerber wrote.. > All, > > 1. Currently FreeBSD (or any other BSD) doesn't seem to be on the list > of approved OS's for classified processing. I'm trying to obtain at > least local approval, but I don't speak the "security language" too > well. Any help would be greatly appreciated. > > 2. The unix's that are approved are Solaris and Redhat/Fedora. I have > reviewed the "PL1 Checklists" and it seems to me that Redhat/Linux might > be the closest set of requirements, so I'm working off that. > > 3. I've "mapped" most of the requirements to FreeBSD (basic unix stuff). > > 4. The major sticking point today is "Accesses to Security-Relevant > Objects". > > a. Under Redhat the requirement is "Implement Snare" or "Implement > LauS (Linux Auditing System". > > b. The Solaris equivalent requirement seems to be set up of the Basic > Security Model "BSM". > > I don't see either of these packages ported to BSD. What is the BSD > approach to meeting the (logging) requirements provided by the above > packages? I thought that MAC might be the answer, but I see nothing > about logging "events" in the manual. > > tnx > mike > -- > --------------------- > Dr Michael A. Koerber > x3250 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" --- end of quoted text --- -- Wilko Bulte [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
