At 05:55 PM 08/03/2005 -0700, Scott Long wrote this to All: >>David Sze wrote: >>>On Wed, Mar 02, 2005 at 08:25:40AM -0600, Art Mason wrote: >>> >>>Yeah, I cam across that on some mailing list archives, but saw some >>>additional references that this can cause issues with the amr driver. >>>Have you experienced any instability issues with the amr driver and >>>PAE enabled? If not, then I'll give this a shot on one of our lab >>>boxes for testing. Thanks for the suggestion, BTW. >> >>On my 2850 the upper 1GB of RAM cannot be addressed without PAE support >>in the kernel. However, amr in 4.11-RELEASE does indeed seem to have >>trouble with PAE. The result being that with the option in the kernel, >>the root device (ufs:/dev/amrd0s1a) cannot be found. >> >>I backported scottl's amr PAE fixes from RELENG_5; the diffs applied >>cleanly (with offsets). I'm happy to report that my 2850 can now >>address its full 4GB and see its amr volumes. >> >>The diff against 4.11-RELEASE is attached, hopefully someone will be >>willing to commit it to RELENG_4. > >I don't have the cycles to watch after RELENG_4, so I'll have to take >your word that this works. What date is this patch against? I >committed some follow-up fixes last week that are required for >management apps to work (and yes, LSI is getting ready to support >FreeBSD with management apps).
The patch is against 4.11-RELEASE, and is just a backport of your commit from Dec. 5th (http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all/2004-December/094923.html). There haven't been any changes to amr since release, so it should apply directly to RELENG_4 as well. I left out the subsequent ioctl fixes and LSI 320-2E support. They look straightforward, but I don't have the software or hardware to test them. If you'd like them in there before committing to RELENG_4, I can take a stab at it and post a new patch. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
