On Friday 11 February 2005 19:02, Mike Tancsa wrote: > At 12:28 PM 11/02/2005, Martin Minkus wrote: > >Is there some coincidence that rl1 is at irq 11 and is the card that has > >problems? > > > >diablo:/usr/src# dmesg |grep 11 > >Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > >pci_cfgintr: 0:11 INTA BIOS irq 11 > >pci_cfgintr: 0:7 INTD routed to irq 11 > >rl1: <RealTek 8139 10/100BaseTX> port 0xe800-0xe8ff mem > >0xd7001000-0xd70010ff irq 11 at device 11.0 on pci0 > >diablo:/usr/src# > > Hi, > There were a couple of postings about the Realtek cards having > "slowness" problems and such. Did you try the patch that was posted ? > > > Index: if_rl.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /usr/store/mlaier/fcvs/src/sys/pci/if_rl.c,v > retrieving revision 1.145 > diff -u -r1.145 if_rl.c > --- if_rl.c 9 Aug 2004 20:22:17 -0000 1.145 > +++ if_rl.c 30 Jan 2005 18:24:23 -0000 > @@ -964,7 +964,7 @@ > #endif > ifp->if_capenable = ifp->if_capabilities; > IFQ_SET_MAXLEN(&ifp->if_snd, IFQ_MAXLEN); > - ifp->if_snd.ifq_drv_maxlen = IFQ_MAXLEN; > + ifp->if_snd.ifq_drv_maxlen = 0; > IFQ_SET_READY(&ifp->if_snd); > > callout_handle_init(&sc->rl_stat_ch);
This is no longer the right fix. It was confirmed that the patch in kern/61448, which I recently committed to HEAD, works (better). Please stay away from the patch above as it is a hack. If nothing else helps - however - please send me a HEADSUP! There is also another rl(4) PR: kern/63190 which I haven't heard back from, yet. -- /"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News
pgpnuoY7wcwcZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
