On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:07, Mipam wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I saw several changes to sched_ule.c in the 5 stable branch. > > Beneath is one of them: > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2005-February/039863.html > > > > Is the ULE scheduler still far from stable in RELENG_5 or not? > > You can now compile a kernel with options SCHED_ULE again. How well it works > is for yourself to determine :-) (I've been using it on my UP machine here > since yesterday only).
Okay, so then the ULE sched is fairly stable then? But it's still not the default scheduler? Is it safe to use right now under RELENG_5 or not? Oh yes, i have smp machines, two physical cpu's and one machine with a hyperthreading cpu and i do have preemption enabled in the kernel config. Would that be still safe to try? Bye, Mipam. _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
