On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:01:49PM +0000, Chris wrote:
> 4 - compatiblity, I remember using 5.2.1 and pretty much all software
> worked well in that and then they did the bind defaulting to base and
> libs version jump, why wasnt this done in 5.0 so 3rd party apps could
> adjust, now we have a situation where most stuff that worked in 4.x
> worked well in 5.1 and 5.2.1 but then broke in 5.3 so effectively 5.3
> was liek a new major version over 5.2.1.

I haven't seen much trouble with the rest, but my way of handling the above
was to take the entire shared library complement from 4.x and load it in a
"compat" directory, then add that to the ldconfig set.

I am still running a whole host of application binaries (indeed, probably 
80% of them) on 4.x code.

No problems so far.

--
-- 
Karl Denninger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist
http://www.denninger.net        My home on the net - links to everything I do!
http://scubaforum.org           Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING!
http://www.spamcuda.net         SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME!
http://genesis3.blogspot.com    Musings Of A Sentient Mind


_______________________________________________
freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to