On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 02:47:08PM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote: > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > In other words, it's an impossible dream to hope that all scripts will > > conform to this or any of the other possible choices (remember the > > perl motto). Even making everything perl in the ports collection use > > a uniform style is probably an infeasible task (recall 840 ports use > > /usr/bin/perl, and that's not counting the others that use another > > hardcoded variant of /usr/local/bin/perl). > > Well, broken ports are marked broken and removed after some months. > How would broken Perl ports justify special treatment?
As I mention above, it's a rule that would be impossible to enforce on third party scripts, so it would be wasted effort to try. Kris
pgpobES3VncK8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
