BjÃrn KÃnig wrote:
Rob wrote:
[...]
both have
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_5
although the first one claims to download CURRENT.
And, eh, why is the filename "standard-supfile" and
why not the more obvious "current-supfile" ?
It only claims, but it doesn't bring you -CURRENT.
> That's the reason why it should not be renamed.
> The standard-supfile contains the standard tag of your release
> to keep it up to date. Maybe someone will change this sentence
> in standard-supfile to 'This file contains all of the "CVSup
> collections" that make up the FreeBSD-stable source tree.' soon.
If so, then why do we have a standard-supfile and a stable-supfile doing the
same thing? If both bring you -STABLE, one of the two seems to be redundant
to me and having two sup files doing the same only causes confusion.
R.
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
