--- Brooks Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > First of all, it is strongly recommened that you use ports-all without > a refuse file. It will save you pain if you want to build an INDEX > later. > Hm. What's an INDEX? Some abbreviated lookup mechanism? Don't see it in the Handbook.
> Second, and more importantly there is no RELENG_4_9 tag. It's > RELEASE_4_9_0 for ports (though you probably don't want a tag at all > since that will result in an out of date ports collection which contains > known security problems.) > Ah. Of course. That explains why nothing's coming. Ok. Question on the current vs. RELEASE_4_9_x, though - I'm still on 4.9 & don't want to upgrade to 4.10, right now. If I get current ports, won't there (possibly) be 4.10 dependencies? Not sure I want that... Thanx for the info. rickb ===== A mind is not a vessel to be filled, it is a fire to be ignited. -- Plutarch _______________________________________________ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
