> > Sure - the newest security fixes go into the release as > well, but why > > not Matt's most recent bug fixes? > > Why not include OpenSSL 0.96d, ipfw2, gcc 3.1 and while we're at it > everyone else's pet software? Where would you draw the line? IMO, > 4.6.1 s/b a point patch release.
Maybe because they are not bug fixes? If we go through the trouble of releasing a new version of FreeBSD why not include a few close-to-critical bug fixes if they are trivial and known to be correct? I fail to see the logic of releasing an x.x.1 version that still has serious known problems that there are known fixes for. -- Daniel Eriksson Lurker extraordinaire To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
