Thomas Gravgaard wrote:
>>I wonder if it might make sense for the ISO to only have a
>>cvsup which does not have X11. A version without X11 will
>>run OK on a system that does have X11, but the X11-version
>>won't run on a system without X11, and it's certainly
>>reasonable to *want* to run cvsup on a system that doesn't
>>have X11. And presumably it'd also save a few bytes on the ISO.
>>
>
> IMHO it would make sense to require WITH_X11 instead of WITHOUT_X11 in the Makefile
>because the default behaviour would run on systems with an without X11. Since I only
>run boxes without X11 it would
> conveniently make my life easier too.... But thats another story :)
I happen to think that cvsup is one program that should be added as a
package. You reduce the side effects introduced by having one port
that needs a modula compiler. The s1g site has both versions and you
download your choice.
Kent
--
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html
FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
