On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 03:39:53PM +0100, Claude Buisson wrote: > On Fri, 9 Nov 2001, setantae wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 02:59:25PM +0100, Claude Buisson wrote: > > > > > > > > Which surely means that the www/mozilla port won't build on -stable, which > > > > means that lots of other people should be complaining about the same thing. > > > > > > > > > > What are you talking about ? I am now running Mozilla 0.9.5 (after 0.9.4) > > > built from port on a -stable system. Never had such a problem. > > > > It's quite clear. > > Mozilla will not build without langinfo.h, and that file is not part of > > stable. > > > > I thought I'd explained it quite clearly. > > > It's quite clear. > /usr/ports/www/mozilla build without problem on a -stable system. > I am using it !!!
Wonderful. However, the facts are as I stated in my original post. 1) The mozilla port, both 0.9.4 and 0.9.5,1 need langinfo.h to build. 2) langinfo.h is not part of -stable. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/include/langinfo.h confirms this to be true. Therefore, the mozilla port will not build on -stable. I have just cvsupped my sources and rebuilt world, the file is still not on my system. Here is the output of uname -v : FreeBSD 4.4-STABLE #0: Fri Nov 9 15:26:50 GMT 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RHADAMANTH > Perharps, you could make it clearer by including a log of your built. If you really want to see it, it's at : http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-questions&m=100507112914360&w=2 All it shows is the build failing because langinfo.h doesn't exist on the system. > Or perharps you are not using the port... Why would I have said I was using the port if I wasn't ? Ceri -- keep a mild groove on To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
