"Thomas T. Veldhouse" schrieb:
>
> Nothing in that article has convinced me that FreeBSD developers can change
> the source at their will and distribute it -- according to the IPFilter
> licence. That right should be implicit in ALL FreeBSD system level source
> code.
I disagree. IPF is part of the ports. Since we accept other beasts (even
without source code access like netscape 4.x) to lurk in there. Thus,
having ipf in FreeBSD ports does in no way conflict with the license of
the base system.
Just my EUR.02
-Christoph Sold
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Valeriy E. Ushakov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:39 AM
> Subject: Re: Should IPFilter be pulled from FreeBSD as well
>
> > On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 09:15:50 -0500, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> >
> > > It is being pulled from OpenBSD for what seems like a pretty good
> > > reason to me.
> >
> > Please, see this message from Darren to NetBSD's current-users.
> >
> > http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2001/05/30/0004.html
> >
> > | I have cleared this up with [EMAIL PROTECTED] and whilst they appear to
> > | be happy that any problems have been resolved, another effort is
> > | required so that [EMAIL PROTECTED] can convey this to NetBSD users in a
> > | meaningful way. A similar message will also be sent to the FreeBSD
> > | people as I've also been working with [EMAIL PROTECTED] to resolve any
> > | issues they had.
> >
> > SY, Uwe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
