On Tue, Nov 14, 2000 at 04:03:19PM -0600, Jeffrey J. Mountin wrote: > Is the bump going to happen before 4.2 or not? I don't know. I'd like to hear Satoshi's response to my last email on the topic. The typical test [in this case] would be does a 4.0R shared binary still run fine on a 4.2-R system. No one has brought this up as the case. And for the example given, I don't know how bumping libc's shared version number will solve the problem. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
- Re: libc shlib version John Polstra
- Re: libc shlib version Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
- Re: libc shlib version John Polstra
- Re: libc shlib version Jordan Hubbard
- Re: libc shlib version Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
- Re: libc shlib version John Polstra
- Re: libc shlib version (co... Jeffrey J. Mountin
- Re: libc shlib versio... David O'Brien
- Re: libc shlib version Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami
- Re: libc shlib versio... David O'Brien
- Re: libc shlib ve... Warner Losh
- Re: libc shli... David O'Brien
- Re: libc shlib version Daniel Eischen
- Re: libc shlib version John Polstra
- Re: libc shlib version Jordan Hubbard
- Re: libc shlib version Warner Losh