No. That's netboot which is a different path in the loader. Warner
On Wed, Nov 6, 2019, 5:04 PM George Michaelson <g...@algebras.org> wrote: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=239876 is relevant > maybe? > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 9:46 AM Julian Elischer <jul...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > > On 11/6/19 2:53 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 2:03 PM Chris Ross <cross+free...@distal.com> > wrote: > > > > > >> On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 02:17:11PM -0500, Chris Ross wrote: > > >>> Hi there. I tried booting FreeBSD-12.1-RELEASE-amd64-disc1.iso on a > > >> [...] > > >>> I need to do? How has 12.1 changed w.r.t. 12.0 for UEFI? > > >> More information. A stable/12 ISO that I built fails in the same way > the > > >> 12.1-RELEASE ISO did. But, I just grabbed releng/12.0, and built a > release > > >> ISO, and it boots. So, something seems definately to have changed in > the > > >> way > > >> the UEFI bits are on the boot ISOs? Or maybe a change in the loader? > > >> Is okay in releng/12.0, but broken in 12.1-RELEASE and stable/12. > > >> > > >> Let me know what to try next. > > >> > > You could try some bisection back along the 12 branch.. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org > " > _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
