On 08/09/16 06:10 PM, bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org wrote: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211491 > > --- Comment #13 from Ngie Cooper <n...@freebsd.org> --- > Please don't add -current or -stable to bugs like this; it spams the list > unnecessarily (this issue impacts users of iSCSI + ZFS -- which seems a bit > niche right now)
I'm sorry that some people were annoyed, although I wouldn't call it spam. It's a discussion of a bug that affects -STABLE, so stable@ is appropriate. Furthermore, it's a new regression that will go into 11.0-RELEASE, so getting some attention is a good thing. I imagine this is why koobs@ CC'd stable@. I thought it was limited to iSCSI, so I put that in the summary. However, we now know that it is not limited to iSCSI. I just updated the summary accordingly. Cheers, Eric _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
