On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 02:05:07PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi, > > On 02.06.16 19:50, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > > I am suggesting next setup: > > > > node0: > > own pool zroot0: mirror-0: local_disk0 > > remote-iscsi_disk1/1 > > local_disk1: exported by iscsi as remote-iscsi_disk0/1 to node1 > > > > node1: > > own pool zroot1: mirror-0: local_disk0 > > remote-iscsi_disk0/1 > > local_disk1: exported by iscsi as remote-iscsi_disk1/1 to node0 > You message lead me to a though that I could use iSCSI to replicate the > zfs pool from node1 to both iSCSI-provided disk on a node2 in a 4-way > mirror, right ? Are there any obvious obstacles to this, that I don't > see, considering the bandwith will be enough ?
No, just regular mirror. And yes, two independed pool. 10G link prefered. 1G link acts like old HDD, about 70MB/s transfer. Every transit switch degrade performance. _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
