Antony T Curtis wrote:
>
> John Baldwin wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > While the newer X bits have several advantages such as being 4.1 binaries
> > rather than 3.x binaries and supporting the i810, they most likely won't be
> > used if I cannot resolve the PC98 issue in the next day or so. Please test
> > this out and give us feedback. Thanks.
>
> Would this mean that I can use FreeBSD 4.1 on a i810 mobo?
> That'd be great - at the moment, I'm having to use a Linux 2.4 beta
> kernel system on my desktop at work... And moving back to FreeBSD is
> something I really want to do.
Just as an aside, there is a patch to get it to run on a 2.2 kernel on
linux...
>
> --
> ANTONY T CURTIS Tel: +44 (1635) 36222
> Abacus Polar Holdings Ltd Fax: +44 (1635) 38670
>
> Your fortune :
> "Show business is just like high school, except you get paid."
> - Martin Mull
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
--
Laurence Berland
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
Windows 98: n.
useless extension to a minor patch release for
32-bit extensions and a graphical shell for a
16-bit patch to an 8-bit operating system
originally coded for a 4-bit microprocessor,
written by a 2-bit company that can't stand for
1 bit of competition.
http://stuy.debate.net
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
