On 05 Apr 2015, at 00:19, Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowl...@kev009.com> wrote: > > On 4/4/2015 3:11 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 04 Apr 2015, at 23:30, Kevin Bowling <kevin.bowl...@kev009.com> wrote: >>> >>> I believe the last bits needed to try clang's ASAN feature is the clang-rt >>> stuff. Will this MFC with a clang 3.5 or 3.6 MFC? >> >> It depends on whether we will ever MFC the most recent version of clang >> to stable/10. Since clang 3.5.0 and later require C++11 support, doing >> this will make it more difficult to upgrade from 9.x to 10.x, and not >> everybody agrees that it is worth the trouble. >> >> Once 9.x is EOL (expected at the end 2016), it might cease to be an >> issue, though. :-) >> >> -Dimitry > > Do you know if the clang-rt stuff will function with clang 3.4 or were there > changes in the compiler to accommodate FreeBSD?
The sanitizer libraries are part of compiler-rt, and the version which is compatible with clang 3.4 does not yet have full FreeBSD support. I don't think it is feasible to backport newer versions of these to accommodate an older clang version. > Wondering if we could try and add just the clang-rt libraries since the end > of 2016 is a long time away :) No, that is not easily done. -Dimitry
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
