> Please don't use subject lines like that for broken links... Sorry. I was sure that the ports page was rendered as an automated process. Making it unlikely that such a dramatic change in pathing would be highly unlikely, if not impossible. > > On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:00:14AM -0700, Chris H wrote: >> Greetings, >> I was performing a ports search, and noticed that all the links >> providing more information about each port goes to the FreeBSD >> 404 page. For example, autotrace-0.31.1_23; >> The link to it is: >> http://www.freebsd.org/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/graphics/autotrace >> the "Long description" link is: >> http://www.freebsd.org/home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/graphics/autotrace/pkg-descr?revision=HEAD >> > > It looks like the paths are messed up somehow. I'll take a look asap. Aren't changes like this verified before roll out?
--Chris > > Glen > >> Both of which return: >> >> Page not found. >> Oh no. :( >> >> Any chance FreeBSD has a backup of the web site? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-...@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-www >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-www-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
